Substitutes or Complements? A Framework for Investigating the Dynamic Interplay of IS Outsourcing Governance Mechanisms
نویسندگان
چکیده
Studies investigating the question whether contractual and relational governance are substitutes or complements have been based on contradictory conceptualizations and have produced conflicting research results. This caused a controversial debate in the field of IS outsourcing concerning the relationship of governance mechanisms. Thus, the goal of this study is to clarify these inconsistencies. For this purpose we revisit the relationship between contractual and relational governance using a refined conceptual framework, which breaks down contractual and relational governance along two dimensions: foundation and action. Based on our framework, we conducted 21 semistructured interviews at a global bank for a post-hoc analysis of governance mechanisms within five IS outsourcing projects. Our preliminary results reveal the existence of dynamic patterns of interaction between the foundation dimension (contract, trust) and the corresponding action dimension (formal control, informal control) of contractual and relational governance. In contrast to previous research, they explain complementarity and substitution as the outcome of dynamic interactions between the two governance dimensions of our framework.
منابع مشابه
Contractual and relational governance as substitutes and complements - explaining the development of different relationships
For a long time research on the management of IS outsourcing projects viewed relational and contractual governance as substitutes. However, subsequent studies provided empirical evidence for the complementary view. Recently, some authors supported the notion that relational and contractual governance mechanisms can simultaneously be complements and substitutes. Given these inconsistencies the q...
متن کاملNew Scope for Research in Traditional and Non-conventional Medicine; Comment on “Substitutes or Complements? Diagnosis and Treatment with Non-conventional and Conventional Medicine”
The article takes its cue from models of quantitative research applied to complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) and pinpoints some innovative features in the case at issue (Portugal). It goes on to outline new research scenarios moving beyond the either biomedical or CAM framework.
متن کاملRelational Governance Mediates the Effect of Formal Contracts on BPO Performance
Research on outsourcing governance has focused on two modes: formal governance based on a legally binding contract, and relational governance based on a psychological contract between the vendor’s relationship manager and the client’s project manager. Some researchers argue that the two forms of governance are substitutes for each other. Others model them as complements. Here, we find empirical...
متن کاملDifferences in Contracting: Anchoring Formal and Relational Norms within BPO Governance
Within IS outsourcing research there is an ongoing discussion whether formal contracts and relational norms function as substitutes or as complements to each other. However, even those deals which are based on relational norms usually comprise a contract as their foundation. We therefore aim at analyzing differences in contracting between both governance modes (i.e. contract-based or based on r...
متن کاملThe Role of Service Level Agreements in Relational Management of Information Technology Outsourcing: An Empirical Study
This study extends the view that formal contracts and relational governance function as complements rather than as substitutes. We investigate how specific characteristics of service level agreements (SLAs) impact relational governance in information technology outsourcing relationships. Eleven contractual elements (categorized into three SLA characteristics: foundation, change, and governance ...
متن کامل